The Body Language Expert & Motivational Speaker

July 7, 2008

Body Language of Mad Dog & Mike: Sportscasters tell the battle…

Filed under: Body Language, Celebrity Analysis, Commentary, Body Language Analysis — Body Language Lady @ 3:20 pm

Here are links to two 2 videos and my answers to the questions that will be posted on Mad Dog & Mike’s blog:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Eft3Q_zO6NE

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gJb1KvwuFvY 

1.  What do you see from the way both men gesture with one another in both of these links?

In the first link of the show at the stadium, as they first talk about the Finway and Camden stadiums, Mike begins a symbolic sword play with his gestures. He strikes the first blow with a dismissive hand flip that indicates him so superior to Russo he can flick him away like a little pesky fly and says do you like Fenway better than Camden? The dismissive backward hand flip is a Slap in the face to Mad Dog. Indicating nonverbally that I disrespect your option and you are going to look stupid in your response to that question.  Mike follows that with several outward sweeping sword moves to Mad Dog the sword fight then begins in earnest with Mad Dog first putting up a very brief peace symbol then a pointed finger to call, “time out, wait a minute” symbolically then an OK sign - all trying to be peaceful in responding to Mike’s attacks but then Russo’s voice gets very angry (that is nonverbal paralanguage) you can hear it get louder and rougher like a mad little kid as his emotions are pushed to the limit. Interestingly, Mike’s voice doesn’t escalate nearly as much as if he is on FM radio calming drugs even as he continues the sword fight his paralanguage indicates he is haughtily superior over Russo… Mad Dog continues to get Mike’s sword thrusts and swords sweeps to his body and Mad Dog continues to respond defensively putting up the OK sign and the protective palm and then near the end he is banging both his hands and puts them in to a fist symbolically pluming Mike and Mike slaps his palm to slap Mad Dog as if Russo was a smart aleck child and Mad Dog was the parent.

2.  They are arguing with one another in the first link (the one about Yankee Stadium), yet it seems like they don’t make a lot of eye contact.  What do you make of that?

The lack of eye contact is just radio eye contact. They are focused on speaking to the audience and into the mics - the rest of their bodies are interacting with each other. If they made eye contact they would have escalated to a real fist fight. Eye contact is the first move towards a fight!

3. In the link about David Letterman (2nd link), Mike gets up and walks out of the segment early.  What is your take on that?

First notice how excited Mad Dog gets when he knows what is being played. His hand flees in the air and he pushes his chair back across the booth as he yells “YES” in huge excitement.. If you watched Mike’s face very carefully he stays very still and then watches his face very carefully you will he realize he is about to be set up and embarrassed on the show and he says something and looks down in disgust. He stays and takes a sip of water. ( your mouth gets dry when you are nervous or under stress) and he swings the mic like when he hears the dig and then makes the comments about Dave making suggestions for the show, (all in very slow) takes his earpiece off and leaves. The listeners who didn’t see him leave would not know just how mad he is. The leaving was about set up being publicly humiliated by the producer it was slam to him.

4.  Many people mentioned roman episode, where Chris does not defend Mike, as a sign of the demise.  What can you read from Mike’s body language as they listened to the Letterman clip on air?

I know Mike is mad at him as he makes that comment (we can‘t hear) to him before he makes the other comments and gets up and leaves. Look at above, I think Mike is mad at the producers for making him look bad…his anger was directed specifically towards Russo. Russo was actually trying to say he didn’t hear the Mike dig when he was on the show. But what Russo doesn’t do is defend Mike then and there and say. Hey I have a great partner and you listeners know that I love him… You can see that Mike waits for that and doesn’t get it, then he leaves.

5.  In the Yankee Stadium link (about 9:30 into it), there is a lot of hand gesturing.  Russo is more animated than Mike.  What is your overall analysis of that?

Russo is more animated, period. He has a more kid like personality than Mike does.

6. Both Mike and Chris have mentioned when talking about their relationship, that their off-the-air issues have manifested themselves on-the-air.  Can you see examples of that in these videos?

Yes, the ones I mentioned.

7. Based on everything you’ve seen from these 2 videos, what does the body language of these two men tell you about their possible future together?

I think Mike is over it. His ego is to big. And Russo is just clueless to how much it affects Mike.

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • del.icio.us
  • De.lirio.us
  • digg
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Furl
  • Spurl
  • StumbleUpon

June 5, 2008

Powerful Presentation Body Language

On his way to the first televised presidential debates, Richard Nixon bumped his knee severely while getting out of his car. Refusing stage make-up for his appearance and sweating profusely, he stood behind his podium favoring his injured leg, his body leaning to one side, making him appear crooked. These factors, in conjunction with his pain-filled face and his hands hidden behind the podium, made him appear dishonest to his television audience. According to the poll of the radio audience, who only heard him speak, Nixon won the debate by a landslide. In the poll of television viewers, Nixon lost by a landslide. John Kennedy won the presidency. If Nixon had known the significance of body language, he might have paid closer attention to the image he was projecting.

What makes body language so significant? What makes those thousands of cues that you give out every minute, so important? Well, while you are rapidly giving out these cues, your audience is subconsciously processing them. In other words, they just look at you and go with their gut. However well supported and prepared your speech content is, it is your nonverbal delivery that establishes your credibility for an audience.

And, most importantly, however you hold yourself, however you move through space, and however you gesture, your body sends messages back to your brain. So, if you are standing with your shoulders drooping and head bowed, the little pharmacy in your brain creates, and sends, negative chemicals into your bloodstream in less than a fortieth of a second - to make you feel the way you look.

The great news is, if you know what creates powerful body language messages, and you integrate that with an awareness of your own body language, you can feel as powerful as you wish to be.

What makes a speaker positively powerful? Attributes like full control of the space, relaxed body language, a posture that is open, and a strong, authentic presence. To begin feeling that power yourself, imagine a lion in the jungle. She establishes her space and territory; she’s queen of the jungle. She’s relaxed; she moves gracefully. If she met a mouse on her path, it’s the mouse who would be tense. Her posture is open; she stretches out her limbs. She’d never have to battle for an armrest on an airplane. She’s -authentic; she carries her confidence and stability with her. She’s herself. She’s not a zebra, though she may study zebras to be a better hunter.

Article Continued…

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • del.icio.us
  • De.lirio.us
  • digg
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Furl
  • Spurl
  • StumbleUpon

May 14, 2008

Some Thoughts on John McCain’s Body Language & Tips for you…

Look at his face when he gets emotional and you will notice that his lips press together, a signal that typically shows that someone is trying to suppress emotion. It would make sense that a former prisoner of war would have learned to do this.  But you can tell he has strong emotions and tries to suppress enormous anger because his cheeks with often fill up with that anger like a puffer fish and blow out. Look for that exasperation signal in people when they are under stress. It let’s you know who is mad and who may explode at any moment. 

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • del.icio.us
  • De.lirio.us
  • digg
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Furl
  • Spurl
  • StumbleUpon

April 9, 2008

Narcissism…

Filed under: Narcissism, Celebrity Analysis, Political Candidate Analysis, Body Language Analysis — Body Language Lady @ 1:00 pm

I have received a lot of emails about the Narcissism read of Obama. I have been reading about Narcissism a great deal. One of my favorite college classes at Florida State was Mythology and I remember very clearly the relish with which our very animated professor told the story of Narcissus, who fell in love with his own reflection. Narcissists generally crave attention, are overconfident of their abilities, lack empathy and can show erratic behavior. I was reading a research study by  Drew Pinsky, an assistant clinical professor of psychiatry at USC. He is known as “Dr. Drew,” on the radio advice show Loveline for the last 20 years. He says that “They are also well-liked, especially on first meeting, are extroverted and perform well in public.”

 Pinsky and Young asked 200 guest celebrities on Loveline to anonymously complete the standard Narcissism Personality Inventory profile, which measures “authority,” “exhibitionism,” “superiority,” “entitlement,” “exploitativeness,”
“self-sufficiency,” and “vanity” as components of narcissism.

While an earlier study found a base test score of 15.3 for the adult population of the U.S., Pinsky and Young found a celebrity average NPI score of 17.84 in their survey, and a whopping 19.2 score for female celebrities, driven by notably higher results for “exhibitionism,” “superiority,” and “vanity.”

“The industry attracts and retains women who place a very strong emphasis on their physical appearance,” the authors conclude. And for reality TV personalities, who scored 19.45 on the NPI, Pinsky and Young say, “Reality television has provided an outlet for narcissistic individuals, many with limited abilities, to believe that they can succeed in the entertainment industry.”

Pile all that on top of the sense of “entitlement” and “exploitativeness” you may recognize the fabulously wealthy party girl heiress, Paris Hilton a veritable poster child for towering, gilded narcissism.

“Knowing that many celebrities have narcissistic tendencies may allow entertainment industry decision makers such as studio executives, producers, directors, agents, publicists and casting agents to work with them more effectively,” Young explained. “It may also provide greater insight into celebrity behavior for the general public.” I think it also may give us insight into the kind of person we may want to be our next president.

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • del.icio.us
  • De.lirio.us
  • digg
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Furl
  • Spurl
  • StumbleUpon

March 17, 2008

George W. Bush & His Clothing Color Changes…

Filed under: Power of Clothing, Celebrity Analysis, Political Candidate Analysis — Body Language Lady @ 2:55 pm

 ”Power red turned to powder blue not long after Bush took the Oval Office in 2001. For five of his State of the Union addresses, the President has worn a blue tie with a dark suit. He’s also favored the color for news conferences and state appearances over the years. Overall, blue is America’s favorite color, people associate it with (being steadfast and constant, always there, dependable,”  

AP Photo President George W. Bush talks during a joint press conference with Egyptian President Hosing Mubarak, following their talks in Sharm el-Sheikh, Egypt, Wednesday, Jan. 16.

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • del.icio.us
  • De.lirio.us
  • digg
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Furl
  • Spurl
  • StumbleUpon

March 16, 2008

The Way Hillary Clinton Dresses…

Filed under: Celebrity Analysis, Political Candidate Analysis — Body Language Lady @ 2:51 pm

 I have always wondered why Senator Hillary Clinton suits look like the rejects from a thrift shop.


Is she making a statement about the importance of recycling? I am especially intrigued to see when she chooses to wear yellow. Oh my god a yellow suit. The last time I saw a savvy women wear a yellow suit was on the 80’s TV show designing women! Hillary represents women…I just want to reach into the TV screen pull Hilary out and take her shopping a Loemans.  Why does she sometimes choose a yellow suite? It could be because it is a great color to where when you’re feeling down. Yellow is color that stimulates our desires, promotes positively and prevents depression. Perhaps we should notice when Hilary chooses to wear that color. Perhaps she uses it to fight her blues. Hum do you think another reason school buses are yellow is to cheer up all those kids depressed to be on their way to the math test in Mrs. Hood’s class?) Because Yellow is a welcoming color, even the color of the pineapple put the entrances of colonial homes to show welcome) and a color that stimulates creativity and good communication it should be a great color for a candidate to wear to give a speech. Yep that cheery, optimistic, big bird color definitely catches our attention. But our eyes can’t rest on it. It’s an irritating color. McDonald’s uses it to get you in and then has it on the walls inside to irate you enough that you will leave and give room for more customers.  Of course sometimes she wears red or blue. Red: red reflects energy, power and strength. Red is a very eye color catching and this makes it useful in case that you want to draw some attention to yourself. Red stimulates fast heartbeat and breathing so it could be an irritating color when it’s over used. It boosts physical energy. Blue When you wear blue you leave an impression that you are loyal and trust worthy. It’s recommended that you choose blue in political meetings and job interviews, because the interviewer may unconsciously trust you more.

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • del.icio.us
  • De.lirio.us
  • digg
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Furl
  • Spurl
  • StumbleUpon

March 7, 2008

McCain vs Obama - Voice Tone and Speeches

Filed under: Celebrity Analysis, Political Candidate Analysis, Commentary, Body Language Analysis — Body Language Lady @ 5:53 am

How does John McCain use his voice and how does it contrast with Obama’s? When a speaker like McCain reads his speeches or gives lists of things, the voice often lowers in volume and becomes a monotone. He still has some variation but without the high highs and low lows of pitch and volume that give Obama such dramatic variability.

McCain’s body language is tight and restrained, which affects the voice by making it more tight and strained. That impression of constraint can definitely work for him as a conservative. To Republican voters it can symbolically suggest that he will stand his ground and not shift positions, just as Obama’s dramatic vocal changes and verbal messages of change appeal to those who want change. The quality and pitch of McCain’s voice suggest safety and stability.

Low volume and lack of vocal variation worked for Franklin Roosevelt in his Fireside Chats during the Depression and World War II because it made people feel safe.(Although Roosevelt was able to rally for dramatic effect like Winston Churchill when he needed to.) If there was a real threat of attack on US soil tomorrow, McCain’s vocal tone and style would be a great asset in his race for the presidency.

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • del.icio.us
  • De.lirio.us
  • digg
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Furl
  • Spurl
  • StumbleUpon

Obama’s Victory Speech for Iowa Caucus Win in January Video

Filed under: Celebrity Analysis, Political Candidate Analysis, Commentary, Body Language Analysis — Body Language Lady @ 5:50 am

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • del.icio.us
  • De.lirio.us
  • digg
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Furl
  • Spurl
  • StumbleUpon

Obama’s Victory Speech for Iowa Caucus Win in January

Filed under: Celebrity Analysis, Political Candidate Analysis, Commentary, Body Language Analysis — Body Language Lady @ 5:23 am

I have been analyzing hours of tape for a three-part History Channel special that I am shooting this weekend. Here are my rough notes on Obama’s voice as he did his victory speech at the Iowa Caucus back in January.  Barack’s voice is naturally a deep, full, low baritone. According to research, deep low voices are perceived as more authoritative, believable, and trustworthy. Combine that with the ease with which he can speak loudly without any vocal strain, and you can hear his voice coming from the TV in another room and feel its authority and power.  As much as she tries to control it and make it sound lower, Hillary’s voice is not naturally low. When she attempts to lower it, she strains it and sounds screechy and angry.   

Obama’s paralanguage is chameleon-like. He changes his voice so dramatically to suit his location, his audience, and his topic, that it is difficult to know just what his real voice is or who he truly is. Listen to how Obama’s cadence has that certain rhythm like a Baptist preacher. Listen to how he speaks on beat and extends certain words. For example, “They saaaaaaaid this day would never come.”  Preachers have a special rhythmic pattern where their voices fluctuate up and down like a song and pause on a beat rhythmically like a paradiddle on a drum. His speaking is so musical and pleasing to the ear, that we can be moved by the rhythm and not even hear the words. In fact the words may actually lack substance and he can get by without really saying anything new in the speech.  

Obama’s vocal style is hypnotic, such that when his voice goes up and then he pauses, you almost want to cheer and say amen. You can’t help yourself.  He actually copies the feel and the cadence of Martin Luther King’s “I had a dream” speech. Listen to how to his volume goes up and up and up…stirring the crowd, and then he pauses for effect. He waits until the audience cheers before he moves on to the next sentence. Pausing makes the word before the pause, and sometimes the entire sentence before the pause, sound more powerful and important.   And notice how he says particular words, like “you small towns and churches, Ameeerica, and affooordableeeee. As he draws these words out, he puts on a slightly more southern accent or he casually slurs the word. That makes him sound like one of the common folk. So even when we know that he came from an upper class family, when he says, “calloused hand by calloused hand,” he sounds like he was there with us working on the farm and plowing the field.

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • del.icio.us
  • De.lirio.us
  • digg
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Furl
  • Spurl
  • StumbleUpon

March 2, 2008

Obama’s Revealing Body Language

Filed under: Celebrity Analysis, Political Candidate Analysis, Commentary, Body Language Analysis — Body Language Lady @ 11:25 pm

If you have been watching Obama speak and give interviews you may have noticed that he seems to reveal spot light more than even the most egotistical of political candidates. He spends a half hour going through the crowd after he is introduced, shaking hands like a Messiah. He has this condescending look down his nose at your sneer when he talks to interviewers and looks especially perturbed and angry when berating someone who he perceives is attacking him. He morphs his voice and body language to suit each audience in a manner that goes beyond customization to easily acting a part. I believe he is narcissistic. Here are other narcissistic nonverbal and behavioral cues that one of my blog readers wrote about Obama.One of my readers is getting his doctorate on evolution and ecology and wrote me:

“I’ve spent years trying to recognize the most accurate indicators of NPD (Narcissistic Personality Disorder). There are a handful that I’ve come to trust, though they’re a bit difficult to convey.

1. An amorphous expression that looks like a child, about three years old, needing approval. I’ve almost never seen this expression in someone who isn’t NPD (occasionally in Borderline Personality Disorder, a closely related type II personality disorder). To me, it’s an exceptionally good indicator. It’s often a fleeting micro-expression (hard to catch without practice). It’s an expression of yearning and need, directed toward the person they’re interacting with. In males, it makes the face look like that of a little boy. Some psychologists argue that a developmental stage goes awry in NPD, roughly around the age of three.
2. The eyes of NPDs usually have an unusual look. My face-reading friend describes them as “dead eyes”. I perceive NPD eyes as “no boundary between inside and outside”. Some people perceive them as magnetic. There’s reduced activity in some of the musculature around the eyes. This includes a reduced response to emotion-laden scenes or speech (e.g. less of a startle response to disturbing visuals). At times, it can produce a “detached” appearance - or a languid, even slightly sleepy look. The startle response of pupils (e.g. to disturbing scenes) is often diminished relative to normal people (both less of a change in pupil diameter, and a longer lag before pupil size changes). I think people with NPD also spend less time playing through internal imagery (visible in eye tracking and facial expressions).
3. There’s also something I call “frozen cheeks”. Muscles in the cheek region aren’t as mobile as in normal people. This is partly due to a subtle expression of contempt and partly due to increased control over appearance.

The contempt can often be an open clear-cut expression, but much of the time it’s just a subtle tensing of the musculature, underlying the “apparent” expression.

Obama displays all of these (the first as micro expressions). There’s also his entitlement body language, his glares, his cocked head and “looking down the nose”, etc.. He occupies quite a bit of space and also frequently initiates physical contact - e.g. putting his hand on someone’s back or arm.

An assured smooth gesture - in a way that’s slightly unusual given our culture’s definition of personal boundaries. The anger in his face is kind of interesting. Sometimes it’s blatant, but more often it’s a subtle expression. When Hillary scores a solid point in a debate, or when a journalist challenges him in a question, you can see a sustained increase in the subtle expression of anger. People with NPD often have a high level of latent anger that can be triggered by any injury to self-image (narcissistic injury).

In case you haven’t seen these, here are a links to a couple of YouTube videos that people have put together capturing some of Obama’s more blatant anger/contempt expressions:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9coNTKQi544 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RvFSECcANZE&feature=related

People with NPD are typically hypercompetitive and hate losing. One woman I know of would throw the checkerboard across the room if she lost a game of checkers with her eight year old son. Obama is clearly hypercompetitive and is known as a bad loser - people that he has played poker with comment on him being a poor loser, and he’s said to be a bad loser in politics as well (e.g. when he lost to Bobby Rush).

Narcissists that I’ve known are generally charming and very well-liked (except by those they’ve injured). They often set up a cult of personality, though on a much smaller scale than Obama - a circle of admiring people.

There’s a need for a high level of admiration.

Paul Street, a progressive columnist, had the following observations after attending an Obama rally in Iowa:

“So why wasn’t I dancing and singing along? Why did I have a terrible taste in my mouth two hours after Obama’s speech even as the sun shone and the warm spring breeze passed through my den just a mile east of the Pentacrest?

Part of it was the narcissism of the self-presentation. Obama does this creepy thing after being introduced.  He approaches the stage only after a good 5 minutes of passing through a parting sea of applauding audience members.

Please. Candidates should stand humbly by the side of the stage and walk up right after being introduced.  I do not attend political rallies to see a pretend savior savoring popular adulation as he dances through the cool stream of the multitude.”

Though people with NPD often cultivate a circle of admirers, they tend to have few true friends. There’s often an odd hint of “aloneness” to them.

You mentioned that you found Obama “chameleon”-like.

This is common in NPD.For someone with NPD, it’s predominantly about the surface - the image in the mirror. There’s less of a solid core. One perspective that many psychologists subscribe to is that in NPD, the “true self” is greatly diminished or largely absent, having largely been replaced by a “false self”.  Another interesting characteristic, in my experience, is that people with NPD often take on a stance of amused indifference. Floating slightly above it all, sometimes with a slight bit of contempt. You can often see Obama doing this in interviews.The entitlement aspect comes through not only in his body language, but also in things he does and says.For example, he was interviewed about the tactics he used to first win elected office, as an Illinois State Senator. It was a very liberal Chicago district, so the only real opposition was in the Democratic primary. He had four opponents, including the incumbent (a woman named Alice Palmer - long time popular activist). Obama hired the best lawyers in Chicago and used aggressive legal tactics to challenge the nominating petitions of each of his opponents; knocking them all off the ballot so that he could run unopposed (it would have been very difficult for him to win the election if the incumbent remained on the ballot). In 2007 a reporter asked him about this:“Asked whether the district’s primary voters were well-served by having only one candidate, Obama smiled and said: ‘I think they ended up with a very good state senator.’And he defended his use of ballot maneuvers: ‘If you can win, you should win and get to work doing the people’s business.’

In my experience, people with NPD use language in a very distinctive way. I have found the following description by Sam Vaknin to be pretty accurate (though the description is too flowery for my taste):

“Narcissists …don’t talk, or communicate. They fend off. They hide and evade and avoid and disguise. In their planet of capricious and arbitrary unpredictability, of shifting semiotic and semantic dunes - they perfect the ability to say nothing in lengthy, Castro-like speeches.

It is the fact that language is put by Narcissists to a different use - not to communicate but to obscure, not to share but to abstain, not to learn but to defend and resist, not to teach but to preserve ever less tenable monopolies, to disagree without incurring wrath, to criticize without commitment, to agree without appearing to do so. Thus, an “agreement” with a narcissist is a vague expression of intent at a given moment - rather than the clear listing of long term, iron-cast and mutual commitments. Communication through unequivocal, unambiguous, information-rich symbol systems is such an integral and crucial part of our world - that its absence is not postulated even in the remotest galaxies which grace the skies of science fiction. In this sense, narcissists are nothing short of aliens.

With cerebral narcissists, language is a lover. The infatuation with its very sound leads to a pyrotechnic type of speech which sacrifices its meaning to its music. Its speakers pay more attention to the composition than to the content. They are swept by it, intoxicated by its perfection, inebriated by the spiraling complexity of its forms.”

Another interesting aspect of NPD is a desire and tendency to “merge” with others. With Obama this manifests, for example, in the nature of the personality cult he is encouraging. You can also see a bit of it in statements like “We are the ones we’ve been waiting for; we are the change that we seek.”

One of the core deficits in NPD - perhaps the core deficit - is a deficiency in empathy. They can talk about empathy (e.g. one NPD woman I know likes to lecture others about empathy), and their cognitive empathy is intact (they can correctly interpret what others are feeling - often better than average), but there’s a deficiency in affective empathy. That Obama can be empathy-challenged has been noted by the occasional reporter. e.g. http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1207/7486.html  

Several genetic studies have been done to separate environmental from genetic effects in NPD (mostly studies using twins). These studies have consistently shown NPD to be highly heritable. Across the studies that I’ve seen, the median estimate of heritability is somewhere roughly around 0.7 (on a linear scale of 0 to 1, with 1 being perfectly heritable). This doesn’t mean that someone with an NPD parent will necessarily be NPD, but it does mean that they’re at substantially increased risk.  There are also environmental risk factors (e.g. abuse or excessive adulation during childhood). Along these lines, the history of Obama’s father is really interesting (ignore the headline - the person composing the headline appears not to have read the article). http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=431908&in_page_id=1770

Obama’s sister had an interesting comment:
 Sen. Barack Obama with sister Auma Obama, left, and grandmother Sarah Obama at his late father’s Kenyan village (Courtesy Mshale)

“Barack was a lot like my father - his hand movements, his gestures, how he talks, how he sits. He’s got certain quietness about him and he sits and he concentrates like my father. He can be in a room full of people and he withdraws on his own. And we’ve all got the Obama hands - the fingers and everything. So it was amazing to watch that, because I was meeting him for the first time but it felt like I knew him.” Another almost-universal feature of NPD is a strong sense of restlessness. Many psychologists attribute this to an internal feeling of emptiness. The feeling of emptiness leads to a desire/need for new experiences, as well as a desire for adulation, and a tendency toward drug and alcohol abuse.

Obama writes about his own restlessness, and it’s been commented on by others. e.g. from a Vanity Fair article:
“A chronic restlessness, an inability to appreciate, no matter how well things were going, those blessings that were right there in front of me.” He has tried to turn this to his advantage. “I know I haven’t spent a lot of time learning the ways of Washington,” he said in announcing that he would run for president. “But I’ve been there long enough to know that the ways of Washington must change.” Obama’s restlessness is a quality that would lead him to conclude, again and again, that the time had come to make a move—to take a chance, to aim higher - when others told him to wait his turn.”

Anyway, those are some of the reasons I think Obama has NPD.

Though NPD is rare in the general population (1-2%), for a very complicated set of reasons I’ve ended up having contact with a pretty large sample size.

So I’ve developed good recognition skills.

I’ll include the DSM IV criteria for NPD.

A pervasive pattern of grandiosity (in fantasy or behavior), need for admiration, and lack of empathy, beginning by early adulthood and present in a variety of contexts, as indicated by five (or more) of the following:  
1. has a grandiose sense of self-importance  
2. is preoccupied with fantasies of unlimited success, power, brillance, beauty, or ideal love  
3. believes that he or she is “special” and unique  
4. requires excessive admiration  
5. has a sense of entitlement  
6. is interpersonally exploitative  
7. lacks empathy  
8. is often envious of others or believes others are envious of him or her  
9. shows arrogant, haughty behaviors or attitudes

Though such abstract criteria don’t capture it in its entirety (and could be misapplied). If you have extended personal contact with people diagnosed with NPD, you’ll find that it’s a really distinctive entity (unmistakable for garden-variety narcissism or other personality quirks).”
~Greg Gelembiuk

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • del.icio.us
  • De.lirio.us
  • digg
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Furl
  • Spurl
  • StumbleUpon
Next Page »

Powered by WordPress